Employers often feel an obligation to implement a drug screening program in the workplace, typically with safety in mind. It is used as a precaution to ensure people who would be a danger to others aren’t hired. Random testing is also used to discourage employees from using drugs after hire.
However, despite the safety aspect of drug screening, there may be negative consequences for employers, as well. For example:
- It may be complicated to implement a fair policy. For example, marijuana is one of the drugs commonly screened for, but this particular drug has a different legal classification at the federal and state level. It also has medical uses and may be prescribed legally in many places. While this alone is not a reason not to conduct a drug screening, it does present a complication, especially if screening out individuals who may have legal standing at the state level. Additionally, marijuana use is common, regardless of its legality, so screening out these individuals may significantly reduce the pool of possible job candidates.
- Employees who are randomly tested may feel it is unfair. Even if drug screening is truly random or only utilized in specific instances, it can still feel targeted by those who are required to. . .
The post Negative Repercussions of Mandatory Drug Screenings appeared first on HR Daily Advisor.
Source: HR Daily Advisor